Monday, November 24, 2008

jgm00002-Skorecki-DNA-Assertion

A lot of fluff but in a nut shell, this research is not above a junior high school level

This article is packed with impressive titles, big name universities, well known scientific publications, achievements, lines to get readers excited and fancy scientific terms.

A a top-level researcher
A leading researcher in molecular genetics
A pioneer in Y chromosome research.
Aish HaTorah, Jerusalem
AMAZING STATISTICS
As a scientist
Being a nephrologist
Center For Cohanim,
DNA analysis to the study of history and population diversity.
Dr. David Goldstein
Dr. Karl Skoreck
genetic archaeologists
His research on the development of the Japanese people.
His research on the origins of the Native American Indians
Maternal genealogies
microbiologist
mitrocondrial DNA
molecular genetics
Nature (July 9, 1998)
neutral mutations, known as a haplotype
non-coding DNA
Orthodox Jewish Scientists
OTHER SURPRISING FINDINGS
Oxford University:
Professor Edward Simon
Professor Michael Hammer
Purdue University
Rabbi Nachman Kahana
Rabbi Yaakov HaKohen Kleiman
Researchers
Science News, October 3, 1998
The Center For Kohanim.
The Cohen Modal Hapoltype (CMH)
The Jewish Genome Conference.
The non-coding regions of the DNA
The prestigious British science journal
The Rambam-Technion Medical Center
The study of the life-sciences
The University of Arizona
The University of Toronto
================================
Impressive titles, big name universities, well known scientific publications, acheivments, lines to get readers excited and fancy scientific terms ... BUT none of the above has any thing to do with their claims.

The basis of the 'Jew' assertion that they can connect modern day 'Jews' to being descendants of Aaron is based on these proceedures.

a) Taking a sample by swabbing inside the mouth (any grade school kid can do this)
b) Sending the sample to a lab (no electron microscope needed)
c) Placing the samples into machines already designed by others. This is not science, it is no more being a mechanic who is trained to use pre-defined proceedures to process the sample. ( A junior high kid could learn how to do this in a day ).
d) A computer than creates a chart, with different areas.

e) Either by visual inspection or OCR (optical character recoginization) there is only one yes or no question.
Does this sample have this particular mutation YES
or NO

f) All samples are taken for the TOTAL SAMPLES
g) Number of (YES) those who have the mutation divided by TOTAL SAMPLES = PERCENTAGE OF THOSE WHO HAVE THE MARKER
.

103 males tested
92 of those males have the mutation

92/103
= .8932039 rounded off 89% of the males have the mutation.
=============================


The total 'science' used is

* Taking samples with a swab
* Placing the samples in a machine that does ALL the computations to create a graph
* Visual or OCR inspection to answer the simple question the sample does or does not contain this mutation
* Adding the total samples
* Dividing the number of samples that have the mutation by the total samples.

This process is junior high stuff. While they add all the fluff of Impressive titles, big name universities, well known scientific publications, acheivments, lines to get readers excited and fancy scientific terms ", the process taken to find these results could be done by a 5th grader
after watching it done in a lab for one day.

The assertion Aaron was the first to have this mutation over 3,300 years ago is based on the % of modern day men calling themselves Cohen that have it. That is the basis of this 'science' in a nut shell.

*
 

No comments: