Monday, November 24, 2008

jgm00009-Skorecki-DNA-Assertion



Professor-Smarty-Pants

Usually when people are in some controversial debate, they like to give credence to their argument by including some TITLE.

Reverend, Rabbi BnSER , Professor, Bloopdblop, Dr. DoDo ... Who says what is proof of NOTHING. What they say and back up with evidence is the ONLY proof that exists.

=============================

People who have nothing to do with being a Doctor, pay a university thousands and they get the title of Dr. ... Professor, and some how this makes gullible people think what ever they say is a fact by virtue of their title.

What is some one with a university degree with the title, Dr. or Professor?

* Just like every one who takes a class, they start out and they pay to take classes to learn what some one else discovered or wrote.

* Books are composed of a collection of facts, discovers, opinions of thousands of people all over the world.

* The university makes the student buy their own books and teaches the information gathered from an array of people from endless places and in the span of time.

* Actually to become a professor, these people pay a university to teach them the knowledge other people have gathered. A very tiny fraction of the courses they teach, ever contain information created at the university.

* So a kid starts out, buys the knowledge of others through a third party (the university) and obtains a degree.

* After they get their degree, they become a professor and then it is they who get paid sell the knowledge created by others to new students.

HIM A PROFESSOR, OH GULLY GEE

Being a professor only means you could stand to read all of your assignments, get through the test and pay thousands of dollars for multiple years.

BEING A UNIVERSITY STUDENT OR GRADUATE

Only means you could stand to read through your assignments, get passing grades and pay thousands of dollars.

Universities are hard to get through

* Because of the finical burden

* The pressure to get through the classes

* Temptation to get into all kind of things when you are supposed to be studying.

* The great amount of information you are forced to learn in a very short period.

Reading, writing and speaking Chinese is very hard to learn for many students and yet little Chinese children learn how.

There is nothing or very little you can learn in a university that a school kid could not learn. Take one page of your book and see if a juvenile can learn the information on that page.

It is not the contents of what you learn but the quaintly of what you must learn that is difficult.

=============================

Ok so you are in college, what is the process:

* You buy their books

* You pay their tuition

* You go to class

* The professor gives you a chapter to read

* You go to a room and beat your brains out trying to absorb all of the information. You can't get behind because this pattern will be repeated over and over until time for the quiz.

The professor really does not teach you the bulk of all you need to learn, you have to learn it on your own time after class. Friends might help you, but the professor is not teaching you all of that information.

If there is something you can't get, you might get the professor to fill that tidbit in.

Do you have to be at college to learn the information given in your assignment? If you commute and read the book at home, will learn different information than if you read it in a dorm?

Now they have on-line classes with people a hundred miles away from a university, they can learn the same information.

Being a university student or graduate only means you have to learn a whole lot of information and pay thousands of dollars.

Being a university graduate gives you a great potential for getting a good job but the bulk of all you paid to learn, will never be used the rest of your life.

=============================

Being a college grad, professor or Dr. adds no credibility to any conclusion you make.

When there is some real problem to be solved or point to be made, ONLY the information gained that addresses the pending question is relative.

Titles / credentials are nothing but fluff. People looking for information about any topic can find the same information learned at a university.

The massive amount of information one learns at a university.. that will never be applied is gathered only because it is a university requirement to graduate. It is for the finical gain of universities.

You have to appease the university to get your degree and you must learn the never applied information to impress potential employers... so when you go to work for them, you have a history of all the information you learned.. that will never be used.

=============================

If you have been out of college a few years, you forget almost all you ever learned.

You will never use 10% of all you paid to learn.

How smart do you have to be, in order to be a college grad? Right now (2008) they have a TV program where constants can win up to a million dollars.

ARE YOU SMARTER THAN A 5TH GRADER

All you have to do to win the million is to answer questions that are taught in the first to 5th grade.

They have a panel of 5th graders who sit on the side and many times the kids know the answers that Harvard, Yale ... university graduates and an astronaut failed to answer.

=============================

When ever you are in a debate or discussion trying to solve a problem, know that when any one begins to drop titles or mentions their education background, that is a moot point.

It is evidence of nothing... it is nothing but Fluff !

If in their education they gained and remembered the information to address the issue,

IT IS ONLY THE SPECIFIC INFORMATION
THAT ADDRESSES THE ISSUE AT HAND
THAT IS RELATIVE

Unless the topic is about that person, the mention (good or bad) about their achievements is used only by those who need to add meaningless fluff

.

Why point out that the names of universities, the amount of education or titles is not evidence of any facts? Because those who wrote this hoax packs the Jew DNA story with such fluff to pad their story. This NON information impresses gullible people who never notice, they have not produced one fact tying modern 'Jews' to any ancient people of the middle east.

*

Encyclopedia Egypt

No comments: