jgm00073-Skorecki-DNA-Assertion

Having the CMH is not a proof of one's being a Cohen, for the mother's side is also significant in determining one's Cohen status.

 

How does the above paragraph prove
(a) this mutation began 3300 years ago
(b) it began in Asia
(c) Aaron was the first to have it.

 

In the beginning 'Jews' write "This markers has come to be known as the Cohen Modal Hapoltype"
Then here they write "Having the CMH is not a proof of one's being a Cohen" 

This mutation did not just come to be known as the Cohen Modal Hapoltype, it was given this name by 'Jews' who applied a suggestive title, so every time the words were read or said, it would be brainwashing that this was indeed something that was passed by the Cohen.

At the top they say this became known as the Cohen Modal Hapoltype.. and here they admit "Having the CMH is not a proof of one's being a Cohen"

This mutation is nothing other than a shared mutation of modern populations that have sex with each other.