jgm00007-Skorecki-DNA-Assertion

Who-Can-You-Believe

Nothing is true or false because it is on any one's web pages. Web pages just give us a place to start our search and verify or cast out assertions made.

WHO IS TO BE CONSIDERED A HOSTILE WITNESS?

* Do they have any religious or political agenda, that might be a motive to publish false information?

* Are they making finical profit by pushing that information?

* Do they try to control the assertions, arguments of their opponents with censorship tactics so only their one sided propaganda is heard?

* Have they been conditioned to have specific beliefs before they could ever talk?

* I the author of this web site am a hostile witness. After years of thought and debate on these topics, I am convinced of the conclusions I have made. I have been shown errors and have corrected my words. I do make mistakes.

What ever you conclude, when you read my words, you must challenge them.

WHO ARE THE MOST TRUSTWORTHY WITNESSES

* Those who make the same profit or no profit at all, no matter what version of information they publish.

* People who's business would actually lose money by creating false information.

i.e. If a nature program were making a travel film about people in an isolated region, it would cut into their profit by hiring actors pretending to be natives of that area.

i.e. The law enforcement offices around the world make their living in identifying bodies that are found, so it is unlikely they would publish false information to the world.

Law enforcement actually gets lots of help from the public in solving such cases so publishing false information would cut their own throats.

* Those who publish information about things very hard to fake, are likely to publish factual information. i.e. People who publish information about the Great Wall of China, the pyramids.

* When people have a great motive to lie or create fake objects that is easy to do, when it is very hard to pin the tail on these frauds, then there will be an endless stream of cons.

Who are we to trust? I can not tell you who to trust, but for myself if an individual or group has a strong motive to lie, censor, deceive people, I am going to bet they will every time they think they can get away with it.

When ever you visit any one's web site you do not need to verify every thing on that page, just focus on any segments of information that deals specifically with the focus of your study.

When you get to those related segments, forget the identities of who the authors are and test the specific information that addresses issues in your study.

PEOPLE'S NAMES AND THEIR TITLES MEAN NOTHING
YOU MUST ARGUE WITH ARGUMENTS
NO MATTER THE IDENTITY OF THEIR ASSERTIONS

No matter if they are sitting in a prison or at the head of a desk at a university, those who have interest in some topic will offer information, it is the information not the mouth it comes out of that must be tested.

As I create these pages, I will include questions for that page. You can answer the questions as you go along and when you get to the end, the conclusions you have made will be your conclusions, not mine.

I know in discussing controversial issues one's opponents will not respond to points you make along the way, but later when you have covered many points they will use negative blanket statements to brush off all the points you made.

By dividing the discussion into pages, you can keep score at the end of each page you can fill in your own answers and make note of any opponents pose any opposition on that page.

If / When some one condemns my words in a blanket statement, tell them to pick out the first page of my false information, point out the paragraph and see if you, yourself find it to be false.

The focus of this study will be the race of western Europeans compared to the original races around the world.

I may point to dozens of videos of Egyptology, National Geographic, PBS, Travel programs, forensic science programs, techniques used by law enforcement through out the world to identify people when nothing is found but their sculls.

You can conclude for yourself if these diverse agencies, publishers have a reason to produce false data, and faked photography in their presentations.

Did the moon landing actually take place or was that faked by the government?

The questions I ask won't be that hard, you will be able to make your own conclusions on each page.

You won't need trust me, when you respond to the questions, it is only yourself you need to trust.

***

Before I get into the study/debate I will cover some of the tricks used by those who attempt to use deceptive methods to convince others.

 

*