jgm00008-Skorecki-DNA-Assertion

Exposing the fluff bunnies before studying the Jew genetic marker story.

===================================

When involved in any study, what facts are relative?


Often when people are in a discussion or debate, one statement is about the education of the source they are quoting.


They have a PHD, they are a professor, they went to college for 6 years.

They have a masters in xyz.

=============================


When we study any issue, there may be hundreds of statements or assertions made.

Each tidbit of information is unique and separate from all the other tidbits of information


Ok, so a person went to a university for 8 years. They took classes in

Biology, Chemistry, Dance, Engineering, French, History, Photography, Sociology, Statistics and probabilities, Trig


No one can discuss all issues of all studies at one time. Bits of information are established one at a time.

=============================

Let's say we have a question about the height of a pole we can not climb.

If some person paid $40,000 for their education and they studied Biology, Chemistry, Dance, French, History, Photography, Sociology, Statistics and probabilities, and took 50 other courses beside these, all the education that does not deal with the question at hand is a moot point.


If a person just took a math class in high school and remembered a lesson in trig, they could solve this problem.


If you took a trig course that lasted 6 or 8 weeks, there would be hundreds of things you learned in trig, that could not help you solve this problem.

=============================

* Studies of any issue may involve dozens or hundreds of individual tidbits of information.


* Each bite of information is unique and nothing in a university course other than that which addresses the question at hand, is relative.


If you are constructing a machine, what you learned in electronics will not help you when you are designing your hydraulics.


What you learned in economics will not help you in figuring stress.


Question #1: A bowling ball was dropped from 30', what was it's speed when it hit the ground.

Question #2: In taking college classes for 8 years

(a) How many of those classes are relative to the question at hand

(b) How much time in the 8 years did it take the person to obtain the information to solve this problem?

=============================

In any study there are multiple bites of information that require an answer that addresses that question and nothing else.


As the list of questions/assertions are made, ONLY the information relative to that point is relative.


All the knowledge, all the education about information that does not address the pending point is moot and a complete waste of time.


Information/knowledge that does not address the point at hand is of no more value than it would be if some one was discussing how to bake a cake and another person responding with the suggested air pressure of a 15 inch tire.

 

Those who inject non related information are nothing but fluff bunnies, who attempt to pad their case with hot air.

ALL INFORMATION

THAT DOES NOT ADDRESS

THE POINT AT HAND

IS MOOT, ABSTRACT, HOT AIR

In pages of this 'document' connecting modern 'Jews' to Aaron, there are not 5 paragraphs that address that assertion. The persons who write this stuff pretending to be coming from a scientific perspective should run for king of the fluff bunnies.