jgm00019-Skorecki-DNA-Assertion

The Cohen line is patrilineal -- passed from father to son without interruption for 3,300 years, or more than 100 generations.

How does the above paragraph prove
(a) this mutation began 3300 years ago
(b) it began in Asia
(c) Aaron was the first to have it.

This is a statement with out a shred of evidence. Neither in this paragraph or any paragraph in this complete text does he ever produce a shred of facts which prove what century it first existed, what part of the world it developed or who was the first to have it.

Before this 'scientist' could assert the Cohen line is passed from father to son.. he would first have to prove that Cohen.. the sons of Aaron had this mutation in the first place.. then he would have to prove these modern white Europeans are descendants of Aaron

Ezra 2:61 And of the children of the priests... Ezra 2:62 These sought their register among those that were reckoned by genealogy, but they were not found: therefore were they, as polluted, put from the priesthood

2,500 years ago after they were in captivity less than 100 years, these priest had no evidence of their heritage and yet these modern Russians, Germans and Pollocks call themselves Cohen.. Let them provide their evidence .

This is my challenge for any one who claims to be able to trace their family tree to the Israelites http://encyclopediaegypt.com/israel/f1000.htm

This guy just spouts a line of BS with out a shred of evidence and the lemmings want to believe it so bad, they never question or work out the math for themselves.. and that is what it amounts to.

Testing 1 1/50,000th of all those who calling themselves Cohen

Finding the % of that trivial fraction that shares the mutation and using that % to assert that percentage proves when, where and who the mutation came from.. that is their science in a nut shell